ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Neural networks improve repeatability of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameter estimation in pancreatic diffusion-weighted MRI.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis in diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) shows potential for characterizing pancreatic tissue, but its clinical application remains limited by sensitivity to fitting algorithms. This study assessed the repeatability of neural network (NN)-based IVIM fitting versus classical nonlinear least-squares in pancreatic DWI. The repeatability cohort included ten healthy volunteers and two type 1 diabetes (T1D) individuals, each scanned twice; the glucose-response cohort included three T1D participants and three healthy controls scanned pre- and post-oral glucose. Diffusion data were acquired at 13 b-values (0-1200 s/mm[Formula: see text]). Four NN-based methods (IVIM-NET, SUPER-IVIM-DC, U-Net, IVIM-MORPH) were compared with two classical approaches (SLS, SLS-TRF) using full (13-point) and reduced (7-point) protocols. Repeatability was quantified using within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and Bland-Altman analysis. All NN-based methods significantly improved test-retest repeatability of the perfusion fraction ƒ compared with classical approaches ([Formula: see text]), with SUPER-IVIM-DC showing the lowest wCV and IVIM-MORPH offering balanced performance across parameters. A reduced protocol shortened scan time through fewer acquisitions while maintaining or improving repeatability compared to the full protocol. Preliminary glucose-response results show both NN and classical IVIM analyses detect physiologically relevant changes. Parameter estimates varied across NN architectures, requiring further validation to establish accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.