ArticlePloS one2026
Gene-transcription factor regulatory networks implicate primary cilia in the evolution of vertebrate sex determination and expand models of epigenetic regulation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The molecular architecture underlying diverse vertebrate sex-determining systems remains elusive despite fragmentary evidence of changes in upstream regulators and downstream mediators. Here we modeled species-specific regulatory networks of urogonadal development for turtles with contrasting mechanisms [Apalone spinifera - ZZ/ZW genotypic sex determination (GSD), and Chrysemys picta - temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD)] using matched data from time-course sampling. We uncovered key steps in the evolutionary transition of sex determination by testing for conservation or divergence of network modular components. Specifically, we tested these alternative hypotheses: first, transcription factor (TF) hubs and their target genes are conserved between species (null H0); second, the same TF hub acquired a new set of target genes in a species, retaining or not ancestral functions (H1 and variants); third, a new TF hub took over the regulation of the former gene targets of an ancestral TF (H2); and finally, complete overhaul occured where both ancestral TF hubs and their target genes were replaced in a species (H3). Results implicate primary cilia as integrators of environmental signals underlying TSD, because known thermosensitive TSD components (e.g., calcium-redox, pSTAT3, Wnt/Rspo1/β-catenin, Dhh) overrepresented in our results are linked to primary cilia. TFs that evolved between species also regulate primary cilia and point to key changes in their sensory machinery that accompanied TSD-GSD transitions (e.g., calcium/ion channels or membrane transport components in Chrysemys versus structural elements and ciliogenesis in Apalone). This novel Primary Cilia Integration hypothesis expands current models of epigenetic regulation of turtle sexual development, the evolution of plasticity versus canalization, and warrants functional validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.