ArticlePloS one2026
Association between occupational hearing loss and predicted 10 year cardiovascular risk among middle aged industrial workers.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOccupational hearing loss is a prevalent occupational disease with potential systemic health implications, including cardiovascular disease (CVD). This cross-sectional study investigated the association between hearing loss and 10-year CVD risk among middle-aged industrial workers in Tehran.
methodsA total of 988 workers (83.7% male, mean age 46.8 ± 5.9 years) underwent routine occupational health examinations, including pure-tone audiometry and cardiovascular risk assessment using the WHO/ISH prediction chart. Hearing-loss phenotypes included low-frequency hearing loss (LFHL), high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL), overall hearing loss (HL), and noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Ear-specific hearing loss was first assessed separately for the left and right ears; participant-level hearing-loss variables were then defined based on the presence of hearing loss in either ear. The WHO/ISH 10-year CVD risk score was reported descriptively. To avoid conceptual overlap between the composite WHO/ISH score and its component variables, the composite CVD-risk variable was not entered into multivariable logistic regression models. Instead, multivariable logistic regression was used to identify demographic, occupational, and clinical factors associated with each hearing-loss phenotype.
resultsThe prevalence of NIHL was 19.9%. Ear-specific HFHL was observed in 27.2% of left ears and 25.5% of right ears, while LFHL was observed in 17.0% of left ears and 18.0% of right ears. In multivariable logistic regression models, sex and age were the most consistent independent factors associated with hearing loss. Female sex was associated with lower odds of LFHL, HFHL, overall HL, and NIHL compared with male sex. Older age was independently associated with LFHL, HFHL, and overall HL. Smoking was independently associated with HFHL and NIHL, while work experience was independently associated with NIHL. Job type and diabetes were not consistent independent predictors in the adjusted models. The composite WHO/ISH CVD-risk score was not included in the adjusted models to avoid conceptual overlap with its component variables.
conclusionThese findings highlight the importance of demographic, behavioral, and occupational factors, particularly sex, age, smoking, and work experience, in occupational hearing loss among middle-aged industrial workers. Although predicted 10-year CVD risk was described in this occupational cohort, the composite WHO/ISH risk score was not included in multivariable models together with its component variables. Hearing conservation programs should integrate noise control, regular audiometric screening, smoking cessation, and cardiovascular risk assessment as complementary components of occupational health surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.