ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Interactive Effects of Executive Function and Language Ability on Children's Cross-Situational Word Learning.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study examined whether executive function (EF) skills predict cross-situational word learning (CSWL) in children and whether EF-CSWL relationships vary as a function of language ability, including in children with developmental language disorder (DLD).
methodFifty monolingual English-speaking children 5-9 years of age completed a CSWL task in which they learned five novel words. EF was measured using indices derived from the dimensional change card sort task, indexing shifting, inhibitory control, and monitoring skills.
resultsEF skills predicted CSWL, but critically, language ability moderated these effects. Specifically, statistical word learning performance improved as shifting and monitoring skills increased, but only in children with average-to-high language skills. Weaker EF skills attenuated the benefit of language ability on statistical word learning in children with robust language systems. Across models, EF explained little variance in CSWL performance in children with weaker language skills, including those with DLD. Inhibitory control, as measured here, played a minimal role in CSWL across children with different language profiles. Lastly, language ability uniquely predicted CSWL, and performance improved with age.
conclusionsThe findings refine theoretical accounts of CSWL by showing that statistical word learning may depend on the dynamic interplay between executive control and language ability. Results indicate that poor CSWL in children may not stem from a deficit in a single domain (e.g., language or EF), especially among children with weaker or atypical language profiles. These results underscore the need for language acquisition models to incorporate EF-language interactions. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33061790.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.