Evidence mapPaperPMID 42525971Full record

SynthesisJMIR aging2026

Effects of Pure Cognitive Training on Gait and Balance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Xiaohan Li, Yat Leung Chan, Guoshi Liang, Cheuk Hin Lau, Tsz Yau Yuki Lam, Chak Hang Lam, Tsz Wing Chan, Hoi Kei Cheung, Wayne Lap Sun Chan, Chun Liang Hsu and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaohan LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2961-2694
Yat Leung ChanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5623-5441
Guoshi LiangDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1396-9270
Cheuk Hin LauDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9385-0932
Tsz Yau Yuki LamDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2287-5304
Chak Hang LamDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6506-4083
Tsz Wing ChanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4087-8579
Hoi Kei CheungDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1246-5837
Wayne Lap Sun ChanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6689-3970
Chun Liang HsuDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-1001
Freddy Man Hin LamDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9918-541X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical and cognitive function, both of which decline with aging, are significantly interrelated. Although numerous studies have investigated the effect of physical exercise on cognitive function, relatively few have examined the impact of pure cognitive training on physical performance.

objectiveThis review aimed to summarize the effects of pure cognitive training on balance and mobility in older adults.

methodsElectronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo) were searched in February 2025. Randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of pure cognitive training on balance and mobility in older adults were included. Pure cognitive training refers to a strictly nonphysical approach involving guided practice on a standardized set of cognitive tasks aimed at optimizing cognitive functioning. For the outcomes, balance performance focused on standing balance tests and comprehensive balance assessment scales. Mobility performance primarily focused on gait speed under a single-task condition (ie, walking only), gait speed under a dual-task condition (ie, conducting cognitive tasks while walking), and the Timed Up and Go test. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to evaluate methodological quality. The level of evidence for the available outcomes was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses of studies with high methodological quality were performed if 3 or more studies were obtained.

resultsFourteen studies were eventually included. The methodological qualities of 8 (57%) studies were rated as good, while those of 6 (43%) studies were rated as fair. A meta-analysis of studies with high methodological quality showed that pure cognitive training has a significant effect on cognitive-motor dual-task gait speed (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.39, 95% CI 0.04-0.75; n=376 participants; moderate-quality evidence) but not single-task gait speed (SMD 0.12, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.30; n=506 participants; moderate-quality evidence). No significant improvements were found in functional mobility (SMD 0.29, 95% CI -0.60 to 1.18; n=566 participants; low-quality evidence) or balance (SMD 0.18, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.69; n=139 participants; very low-quality evidence).

conclusionsCognitive training does not improve balance or mobility under single-task conditions but does improve walking speed under cognitive-motor dual-task conditions in older adults. A cognitive training protocol targeting executive function, consisting of 40- to 60-minute sessions conducted 2 to 3 times per week over a period of 8 to 10 weeks, has been shown to be effective.

Indexed as

Cognitive TrainingGaitPostural BalanceAgedCognitionDual-Task TestsHumansagingbalancecomputerized cognitive traininggaitolder adultsphysical performance

Identifiers

PMID42525971
PMCPMC13469839

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.