Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42526088›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Effect of antioxidant supplementation on the reproduction of brown egg-layer breeders.

Amanda de Moura Dani, Alexandre Pires Rosa, Cassiane Turchetto Ditadi, Julia Schneider, Daniele Cristina de Lima Escrobot, Guilherme Francisco Deda, Edita Sostaric Zandee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanda de Moura DaniPoultry Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Avenida Roraima No. 1000, 97105-900, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Electronic address: amandadani0202@gmail.com.
Alexandre Pires RosaPoultry Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Avenida Roraima No. 1000, 97105-900, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Cassiane Turchetto DitadiPoultry Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Avenida Roraima No. 1000, 97105-900, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Julia SchneiderPoultry Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Avenida Roraima No. 1000, 97105-900, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Daniele Cristina de Lima EscrobotImpextraco Latin America, Ltda. Rua Curió, 312, 83707-760, Araucária, Paraná, Brazil.
Guilherme Francisco DedaImpextraco Latin America, Ltda. Rua Curió, 312, 83707-760, Araucária, Paraná, Brazil.
Edita Sostaric ZandeeImpextraco NV, Wiekevorstsesteenweg 38, 2220, Heist-op-den-Berg, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant extracts rich in bioactive compounds, particularly polyphenols, have gained increasing attention in poultry breeder nutrition owing to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. These properties help preserve intestinal integrity and support improvements in gamete quality and embryonic viability. Commercial feed products, such as Elife®, have been developed to incorporate additives, including flavonoids, proanthocyanidins, and phenolic acids, delivering polyphenols in highly bioavailable forms and ensuring effective antioxidant activity. This study evaluated the effects of dietary supplementation with Elife® in brown egg-layer breeders (males and females) on productive and reproductive performance, egg quality, incubation traits, and progeny outcomes. Two experiments were conducted with birds aged from 54 to 70 weeks. In Experiment 1, 30 Rhode Island Red roosters were allocated to the following treatment groups: basal diet without additives (CON); basal diet + 0.5 kg of Elife®/t of feed (E500); and basal diet + 1 kg of Elife®/t of feed (E1000). Body weight, feed intake, and sperm quality were measured in each rooster every 28 days. For Experiment 2, 210 White Plymouth Rock brown egg-layer hens were assigned to the same three treatments as in Experiment 1. Body weight, feed intake, laying rate, egg quality, and incubation parameters were recorded every 28 days. Roosters receiving E1000 showed significantly improved sperm motility and an increased proportion of morphologically normal sperm without affecting feed intake, body weight, or sperm vigor. Hens under E1000 had lower feed intake than controls while maintaining egg quality (P > 0.05). Furthermore, combined parental supplementation with Elife® improved egg hatchability, reduced early embryonic mortality, and increased day-old chick weight. Overall, combined parental supplementation with Elife® demonstrated an effective nutritional strategy for improving fertility, embryonic viability, and chick quality in brown egg-layer breeders.

Indexed as

Brown egg–layer breedersPolyphenolsReproductionSperm quality

Identifiers

PMID42526088
PMCPMC13450188

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.