ArticleBMJ open2026
Reaching young and low-income people for sexual healthcare in Zurich, Switzerland: perspectives from healthcare workers - a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFree voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) interventions improve access to HIV and sexually transmitted infections prevention, particularly for underserved populations. Financial barriers are widely recognised as a key deterrent to testing uptake in vulnerable populations. In 2023, Zurich (Switzerland) introduced a pilot programme offering free VCT for young people and low-income residents.
objectivesThis study explores healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences with implementing the programme, with a focus on perceived benefits, barriers and opportunities for improvement.
designWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study based on semistructured interviews with HCPs.
settingTwo clinics participating in a city-wide pilot programme providing free counselling and testing in Zurich, Switzerland.
participants12 HCPs (60% response rate) from the two participating clinics were interviewed. OUTCOMES: HCPs' perceived benefits of the programme, barriers to uptake, underserved populations and recommendations for improvement.
resultsHCPs viewed the programme as an effective entry point into sexual healthcare for young people and first-time testers, particularly due to the removal of financial barriers. Counselling was seen as its most important component, promoting knowledge-sharing and early engagement in preventative healthcare. While the programme successfully reached well-informed, highly educated individuals, key high-risk groups, including vocational students, conservative individuals, asylum seekers and those under 18, remained underserved. Reported barriers included stigma, misinformation and long appointment waiting times. HCPs recommended improved outreach to vocational schools, more inclusive educational materials and mobile testing initiatives to improve accessibility.
conclusionsHCPs consider free VCT programmes a critical tool for equitable access to sexual healthcare. However, to maximise their reach and impact, targeted, context-sensitive strategies are needed to engage underserved and high-risk populations more effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.