ArticleScientific reports2026
Therapeutic potential of Echinocactus grusonii and its associated endophytic fungus Aspergillus oryzae in neuroprotection: in vitro and in silico investigations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Golden Barrel Cactus (Echinocactus grusonii, syn. Kroenleinia grusonii), native to Mexico, is well known in horticulture but remains insufficiently studied with respect to its chemical composition. This study examined the chemical profile and neuroprotective potential of Echinocactus grusonii spines and its endophytic fungus, Aspergillus oryzae. The spines contained markedly higher levels of phenolics (293 mg gallic acid/g DW extract), flavonoids (132 mg quercetin/g DW extract), and alkaloids (14.5 mg atropine/g DW extract) compared to the stem. Untargeted metabolomics (UPLC-HRMS/MS) tentatively identified 27 metabolites in the spines and 14 in the fungal extract. Both extracts exhibited potent, dose-dependent inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and β-secretase (BACE-1). The spines extract showed IC₅₀ values of 0.362 µg/mL (AChE) and 0.425 µg/mL (BACE-1), while the fungal extract was more effective against AChE (IC₅₀ = 0.255 µg/mL). In silico docking was performed for all identified compounds, and molecular dynamics simulation of the top-scoring candidates demonstrated stable interactions with the target enzymes. These findings highlight the spines of Echinocactus grusonii and their associated endophytes as promising dual-target neuroprotective sources for the management of neurodegenerative disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.