Articlenpj biomedical innovations2026
Rethinking pathology image analysis through shuffling.
Article in npj biomedical innovations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pathological examination is the current gold standard in cancer diagnosis, yet artificial intelligence (AI) methods still struggle to capture the multi-scale heterogeneity of tumor morphology across patients, tissues, and magnifications. Here, we introduce the PAthoentity Shuffle Strategy (PASS), a principled framework that explicitly models pathoentities, the critical biological structures such as cells, glands, and tissues, and their hierarchical relationships. By controlled shuffling of pathoentities within and across samples, PASS enriches the relational structure available to neural networks, encouraging them to learn both local homogeneity and global heterogeneity. We provide theoretical analysis showing that PASS achieves error bounds comparable to state-of-the-art methods, supporting shuffling as a generalizable computational principle rather than a heuristic. Extensive evaluation on 10 datasets spanning 8 diseases, 9 organs, and 4 magnification levels demonstrates consistent performance gains, robust generalization, and scalability across diverse pathological contexts. Importantly, PASS further shows translational value in a rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) scenario in gastroenterology, highlighting its potential for clinical deployment. Overall, this study establishes pathoentity shuffling as an effective principle for pathological image analysis, bridging biological insight and computational design to enhance diagnostic modeling and morphological hierarchy learning.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.