Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527484›Full record

Articlenpj health systems2026

MAP: evaluation and multi-agent enhancement of large language models for inpatient pathways.

Zhen Chen, Zhihao Peng, Xusheng Liang, Cheng Wang, Peigan Liang, Linsheng Zeng, Minjie Ju, Yixuan Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A comprehensive survey of AI agents in healthcare.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhen Chen *Department of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.
Zhihao Peng *Department of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.
Xusheng Liang *Department of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.
Cheng WangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.
Peigan LiangGuangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Linsheng ZengShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Minjie JuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yixuan YuanDepartment of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR. yxyuan@ee.cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) General Research Fund 14220622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inpatient pathways require complex clinical decision-making based on comprehensive patient information, yet research on medical LLMs is limited in this area due to the lack of large-scale datasets. Existing medical benchmarks primarily focused on question-answering and examinations, overlooking the multifaceted nature of inpatient decision-making. To address this gap, we developed the IPDS benchmark, comprising 51,274 cases across 9 triage departments, 17 major disease categories, and 16 treatment options. We further proposed the Multi-Agent Inpatient Pathways (MAP) framework, containing three specialized clinical agents: a triage agent for patient admission, a diagnosis agent for diagnostic decision-making, and a treatment agent for care planning. A chief agent guides and promotes these agents to ensure coordination. Experiments demonstrated that MAP achieved superior alignment with operational protocols compared to state-of-the-art LLMs. The MAP sets a foundation for advancing inpatient support systems, offering significant potential for enhancing operational efficiency and resource planning in healthcare facilities.

Identifiers

PMID42527484
PMCPMC13336800

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.