Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527501›Full record

Articlenpj health systems2026

KneeXNet-2.5D: a clinically-oriented and explainable deep learning framework for MRI-based knee cartilage and meniscus segmentation.

Maimouna Sanogo, Fengyi Gao, Nickolas Littlefield, Ismaeel A Siddiqui, Luke A Carlson, Amin Rezaei, Pavan Bodanki, Zoe Menezes, Abha Kanda, Mehrnaz Abedian and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Maimouna Sanogo *School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Fengyi Gao *Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nickolas Littlefield *Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ismaeel A SiddiquiSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Luke A CarlsonSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Amin RezaeiIntelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Pavan BodankiSchool of Computing, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Zoe MenezesSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abha KandaSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mehrnaz AbedianSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
George M MastorakosScienza Health, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Michael R KannSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Soheyla AmirianSeidenberg School of Computer Science and Information Systems, Pace University, New York, NY, USA.
Maedeh AgharazidermaniSchool of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Arezoo Sarkheyli-HägeleDepartment of Computer Science and Media Technology, Sustainable Digitalization Research Center (SDRC), Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Kasey HarshmanSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nicole MyersSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Hilal Maradit KremersDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
James J IrrgangSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Brian J McGroryDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Adolph J YatesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Johannes F PlateDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. platefj2@upmc.edu.
Ahmad P TaftiSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. tafti.ahmad@pitt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of knee cartilage and meniscus in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for the early detection and monitoring of complications such as cartilage erosion and osteoarthritis. Yet, manual annotation remains time-consuming, subjective, and inefficient for routine clinical use. In this study, we introduced KneeXNet-2.5D, a clinically oriented and explainable deep learning framework for accurate and efficient knee cartilage and meniscus segmentation in sagittal MRIs. Unlike traditional 3D segmentation methods, the proposed model employs a 2.5D architecture to capture inter-slice spatial context, achieving high segmentation accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency and optimal resource utilization. We further incorporated targeted image augmentation, including synthetic noise injection, to enhance the AI model robustness against medical imaging variability. The efficient design of the 2.5D model allows for reduced resource consumption, making it suitable for deployment in healthcare settings with limited computational infrastructure, particularly in low-resource hospitals and rural care environments. To enable open scientific research and ensure reproducibility, we constructed a gold-standard, manually segmented knee MRI dataset and publicly released it alongside the annotation guideline, source code, trained AI models, and a lightweight software application. An entropy-based AI explainability strategy was developed to highlight high-uncertainty regions that are most influential to model predictions, advancing transparency and interpretability. Clinical relevance and anatomical validity were further assessed through expert review by board-certified orthopedic surgeons. Together, these contributions demonstrate the AI model's anatomical fidelity, interpretability, and readiness for integration into musculoskeletal imaging workflows.

Identifiers

PMID42527501
PMCPMC13354193

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.