Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527503›Full record

Articlenpj health systems2026

The future of long-term care financing in Ghana: preferences among dual-role unorganised caregivers of older adults.

Daniel Offei, Ulrika Enemark, Robert Darko Osei, Charles Godfred Ackah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel OffeiInstitute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. offeidaniel@gmail.com.
Ulrika EnemarkDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Robert Darko OseiInstitute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Charles Godfred AckahInstitute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark DFC file no. 19-06-AU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term care (LTC) demand in Ghana is increasing due to rapid population ageing, raising concerns about how care can be sustainably financed. In the absence of a formal LTC system, care is largely provided and financed by unorganized family caregivers who often assume both caregiving and financial responsibilities. The study examined preferences for LTC financing models among such caregivers and assessed how these preferences are shaped by caregiving beliefs, caregiver-recipient relationships, and specific caregiving tasks. A cross-sectional survey of 1116 dual-role caregivers across three regions of Ghana was conducted. Multinomial logistic regression models were estimated, and results were presented as average marginal effects comparing preferences for insurance-based and tax-financed models relative to family or out-of-pocket financing. The results show that greater intensity of personal care provision was associated with a higher probability of preferring insurance-based financing, increasing the probability by about 3.6 percentage points (dy/dx = 0.036, p = 0.002). Similarly, greater provision of emotional support increased the probability of preferring tax-financed models by approximately 7.8 percentage points (dy/dx = 0.078, p < 0.001). These associations varied by caregiver-recipient relationship and caregiving beliefs. Sustainable LTC financing in Ghana should therefore reflect caregiving intensity, beliefs, and income differences among caregivers.

Identifiers

PMID42527503
PMCPMC13354223

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.