ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2026
Real-world efficacy and safety of avatrombopag in Japanese patients with chronic liver disease and severe thrombocytopenia.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag (AVA) in Japanese patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and severe thrombocytopenia in a real-world clinical setting.
methodsThe study included CLD patients with platelet counts < 50,000/μL, who received AVA before invasive procedures. Platelet-increasing effect and associated factors were examined, and adverse events were investigated.
resultsSixty-three patients were included, with 10 repeat registrations for different procedure. Thus, the efficacy of AVA was evaluated in 53 unique patients at initial registration, while the comparison based on prior thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) treatment history was conducted in all 63 patients. Patients were divided by baseline platelet count (BPC) into Low BPC (< 40,000/μL; n = 24) and High BPC (≥ 40,000/μL; n = 29) groups. The median platelet counts at baseline and before procedures were 43,000/μL and 75,000/μ, respectively. A platelet increase of ≥ 20,000/μL from baseline was observed in 37 patients (69.8%), and no significant differences were found between the Low BPC and High BPC groups. In addition, a platelet count of ≥ 50,000/μL was achieved in 49 (92.5%) before procedures and 51 (96.2%) avoided platelet transfusions. A multivariate analysis identified body weight > 68 kg as the only significant factor associated with platelet count increase < 20,000/μL. Platelet-increasing effects did not differ by TPO-RA administration history. No adverse events, including portal vein thrombosis or hemorrhagic events, occurred.
conclusionsWhile interpretation requires caution due to the small sample size, in Japanese real-world practice, AVA was relatively safe and effective in preventing perioperative bleeding and avoiding platelet transfusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42527694What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.