Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527765›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2026

Diffusion models for virtual populations and pharmacometric simulations.

Prathamesh Kishor Gadgil, Shamith Manjunath Poojari, Murali Ramanathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prathamesh Kishor GadgilArtificial Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, 355 Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14214-8033, USA.
Shamith Manjunath PoojariArtificial Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, 355 Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14214-8033, USA.
Murali RamanathanArtificial Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, 355 Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14214-8033, USA. Murali@Buffalo.Edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate diffusion model-based artificial intelligence approaches for generating virtual populations with physiological determinants of drug dosing (PDODD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles. A denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) was applied to a 31-variable dataset of PDODD covariates (18 continuous, 13 binary) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and compared to a tabular variational autoencoder (TVAE). For nivolumab PK data (12,000 patients, 13 time points, 5 covariates), sequence-based diffusion model (SDM) and a time-aware diffusion model (TDM) with temporal self-attention were evaluated. The predictive performance of the TDM was evaluated by imputing masked time points. All models were trained and tested on 80%:20% partitions of the data using univariate, bivariate, and multivariate distributional similarity metrics. The diffusion model satisfactorily approximated the univariate distributions of continuous PDODD biomarkers (mean Kolmogorov-Smirnov D-statistic, KSD = 0.014), disease status frequencies (mean absolute error, MAE = 0.31%), and preserved bivariate correlations (MAE = 0.033). DDPM outperformed TVAE for categorical variables (0.31% vs. 1.07% MAE) and correlation (0.033 vs. 0.091 MAE). For nivolumab PK, SDM has KSD of 0.047 and a relative error of 1.36%. TDM accurately imputed missing PK timepoints (KSD = 0.014), reconstructing masked Day 1, Peak concentration (Cmax) Dose-9, and Terminal phase concentrations with MAE of 0.43%, 0.25%, and 0.76%, and correlations ≥ 0.999. Diffusion models demonstrated strong performance in generating cross-sectional PK covariate data and longitudinal PK profiles, capturing complex distributional and temporal dependencies. Diffusion-based approaches provide a flexible and robust framework for virtual simulations in pharmacometrics.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, StatisticalArtificial IntelligenceAutoencoderComputer SimulationFemaleHumansNutrition SurveysArtificial intelligenceDiffusion modelsGenerative AIPharmacometricsPhysiological determinants of drug dosingPrecision medicineTabular VAE

Identifiers

PMID42527765
PMCPMC13421196

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.