ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Understanding the role of non-HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation: a literature review.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-HLA antibodies have emerged as important contributors to antibody-mediated rejection and long-term graft dysfunction in kidney transplantation, including in patients without detectable donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA-DSAs). This review summarizes current evidence on major non-HLA antibody targets, including angiotensin II type 1 receptor, endothelin A receptor, perlecan fragment LG3, vimentin, major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related molecule A, collagen, fibronectin, natural antibodies, and glutathione S-transferase theta 1, and highlights their mechanisms of formation, pathogenic roles, and clinical associations. These antibodies can arise through alloimmune or autoimmune processes, often driven by endothelial injury, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and inflammatory signaling, which may expose cryptic antigens and promote loss of self-tolerance. Mechanistically, non-HLA antibodies can mediate graft injury through complement activation, Fc receptor-dependent immune responses, and direct signaling effects on endothelial and vascular cells, leading to inflammation, microvascular injury, and fibrosis. Importantly, they can act synergistically with HLA-DSA, amplifying immune responses, and contributing to worse transplant outcomes. However, findings across studies remain inconsistent due to heterogeneity in detection methods, lack of standardized thresholds for positivity, and variability in patient populations. Additionally, temporal dynamics in antibody development and fluctuations over time suggest that static measurements may not fully capture their clinical relevance. The presence of non-HLA antibodies in healthy populations further complicates interpretation and highlights the need to better define clinically meaningful thresholds. Given the wide diversity in antigen targets, biological functions, and mechanisms of action, a one-size-fits-all approach is insufficient. Instead, individual non-HLA antibodies should be investigated through targeted mechanistic and clinical studies to clarify their specific roles in transplant outcomes. Future research should prioritize large-scale, multicenter prospective studies with standardized methodologies, alongside mechanistic investigations, to improve risk stratification and advance understanding of their impact on long-term kidney transplant success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.