ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Association between albuminuria and prevalent diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study with exploratory analysis by carotid plaque status.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic kidney disease share common microvascular mechanisms, whereas carotid plaque reflects systemic atherosclerotic burden in type 2 diabetes (T2D). We examined the association between urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) and prevalent diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes and conducted exploratory analyses to assess whether this association differed according to carotid plaque status. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 502 patients with T2D. DR was assessed using fundus photography, and carotid plaque was evaluated by ultrasonography. Because of its skewed distribution, ACR was natural log-transformed as lnACR. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between lnACR and DR. Subgroup and interaction analyses were performed according to carotid plaque status. Results: Among 502 participants, 95 (18.9%) had DR. In the extended logistic regression model adjusted for selected clinical covariates, lnACR was associated with prevalent DR (adjusted OR = 1.291, 95% CI: 1.045-1.595, Conclusions: Higher lnACR was associated with prevalent DR in adjusted logistic regression, whereas the corresponding modified Poisson sensitivity analysis showed an attenuated, non-significant association. Carotid plaque-related findings were exploratory, and no statistically significant interaction was observed. Because of the cross-sectional complete-case design, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence of incident DR risk, prediction, or support for changes in ophthalmic screening practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.