ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Study method for a single-arm, multi-center implementation study of strategies for use by healthcare professionals in offering smokers an adapted proactive referral for online smoking cessation treatment in health check-up settings: a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation study (N-EQUITY2405).
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Proactive referral, defined as a strategy to connect smokers with smoking cessation programs under the responsibility of healthcare professionals, is effective in increasing the uptake of such programs. A feasibility study in a health check-up setting of the Brief Tobacco Intervention with Proactive Referral (BTI-PR), our smoker-level implementation strategy for smoking cessation treatment (SCT), revealed that the BTI-PR could be delivered to 85.7% of smokers as intended by healthcare professionals following provider-level guidance on implementation, which included educational sessions and the provision of materials. The present study aimed to estimate smoker uptake of SCT following a multifaceted, provider-level implementation strategy in Japanese real-world health check-up settings. Methods: This single-arm, multi-center, uncontrolled hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation study is focused on providing stakeholders with the evidence necessary to support adoption of the BTI-PR together with its provider-level implementation strategy. The BTI-PR is a smoker-level implementation strategy for SCT which acts by motivating smokers to schedule an online SCT appointment by themselves. The provider-level implementation strategy consists of eight components: (a) conduct a training session, (b) provide a guide on the BTI-PR, (c) provide a checksheet for the BTI-PR, (d) provide a flyer on the online SCT, (e) conduct a kickoff meeting and request to discuss pre-specifiable matters, (f) schedule a pre-implementation phase, (g) request holding a review meeting and report, and (h) conduct a plenary meeting to share local knowledge. Primary outcome is the penetration of online SCT, namely the proportion of smokers eligible for the BTI-PR who attend the first session of the online SCT within 3 months after receiving the BTI-PR. Results: Data collection was completed in February 2026. A total of 24 healthcare professionals who received the provider-level implementation strategy delivered the BTI-PR to smokers to explore the primary outcome. The final analyses were commenced in March 2026. Conclusion: This study is expected to support the adoption of proactive referral together with an implementation strategy in health check-up settings, although causal inference remains limited. The findings will contribute to the implementation of effective smoking cessation support into preventive health services. Trial registration number: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000064502; UMIN-CTR, number UMIN000056447.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.