Evidence mapPaperPMID 42528746Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Study method for a single-arm, multi-center implementation study of strategies for use by healthcare professionals in offering smokers an adapted proactive referral for online smoking cessation treatment in health check-up settings: a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation study (N-EQUITY2405).

Keiichi Yuwaki, Taichi Shimazu, Chie Taniguchi, Miyuki Odawara, Junko Saito, Aya Kuchiba, Manami Inoue, Hirohito Sone, Masakazu Nakamura, Kiminori Kato

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Keiichi YuwakiDivision of Behavioral Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Taichi ShimazuDivision of Behavioral Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Chie TaniguchiCollege of Nursing, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Miyuki OdawaraDivision of Behavioral Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Junko SaitoDivision of Behavioral Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Aya KuchibaGraduate School of Public Health, Teikyo University, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Manami InoueDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirohito SoneDepartment of Hematology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Niigata University Faculty of Medicine, Niigata, Japan.
Masakazu NakamuraRural Health Research Center, Institute of Community Medicine, Japan Association for Development of Community Medicine, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiminori KatoDepartment of Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases and Promotion of Health Checkup, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Proactive referral, defined as a strategy to connect smokers with smoking cessation programs under the responsibility of healthcare professionals, is effective in increasing the uptake of such programs. A feasibility study in a health check-up setting of the Brief Tobacco Intervention with Proactive Referral (BTI-PR), our smoker-level implementation strategy for smoking cessation treatment (SCT), revealed that the BTI-PR could be delivered to 85.7% of smokers as intended by healthcare professionals following provider-level guidance on implementation, which included educational sessions and the provision of materials. The present study aimed to estimate smoker uptake of SCT following a multifaceted, provider-level implementation strategy in Japanese real-world health check-up settings. Methods: This single-arm, multi-center, uncontrolled hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation study is focused on providing stakeholders with the evidence necessary to support adoption of the BTI-PR together with its provider-level implementation strategy. The BTI-PR is a smoker-level implementation strategy for SCT which acts by motivating smokers to schedule an online SCT appointment by themselves. The provider-level implementation strategy consists of eight components: (a) conduct a training session, (b) provide a guide on the BTI-PR, (c) provide a checksheet for the BTI-PR, (d) provide a flyer on the online SCT, (e) conduct a kickoff meeting and request to discuss pre-specifiable matters, (f) schedule a pre-implementation phase, (g) request holding a review meeting and report, and (h) conduct a plenary meeting to share local knowledge. Primary outcome is the penetration of online SCT, namely the proportion of smokers eligible for the BTI-PR who attend the first session of the online SCT within 3 months after receiving the BTI-PR. Results: Data collection was completed in February 2026. A total of 24 healthcare professionals who received the provider-level implementation strategy delivered the BTI-PR to smokers to explore the primary outcome. The final analyses were commenced in March 2026. Conclusion: This study is expected to support the adoption of proactive referral together with an implementation strategy in health check-up settings, although causal inference remains limited. The findings will contribute to the implementation of effective smoking cessation support into preventive health services. Trial registration number: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000064502; UMIN-CTR, number UMIN000056447.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelReferral and ConsultationSmokersSmoking CessationAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle Agedclinical trial protocolimplementation sciencepragmatic clinical trialreferral and consultationsmoking cessationtobacco

Identifiers

PMID42528746
PMCPMC13414892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.