SynthesisFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
The relationship between motor and cognitive performance and cortical activity in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of functional near-infrared spectroscopy studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This review aimed to examine the relationship between motor/cognitive performance and cortical activity in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) under single- and dual-task conditions using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Methods: The review was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD420261402862) and followed the PRISMA protocol. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched, and 18 relevant studies were included to address four core questions: (1) whether cortical activation differs between MS patients and healthy controls; (2) how activation patterns vary under single- vs. dual-task conditions; (3) whether activation is associated with motor/cognitive performance; and (4) the potential mechanisms underlying altered cortical activation. Results: The findings suggest that some MS patients may exhibit increased cortical activation alongside reduced performance. During single tasks, activation in motor/cognitive regions was often higher than that observed in healthy controls, and in some studies, this activation correlated with the severity of disability. This pattern became more pronounced under dual-task conditions, with concurrent declines in gait and cognitive performance reported. Rehabilitative interventions may help modulate such activation. Conclusions: Certain MS patients demonstrate increased task-related cortical activation accompanied by reduced performance. While this may reflect alterations in neural efficiency or neurovascular coupling, it could also indicate compensatory recruitment or increased attentional effort, depending on the task, disability severity, and disease-related factors. fNIRS may serve as a useful monitoring tool, and future multimodal EEG-fNIRS research is warranted to clarify the underlying mechanisms. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261402862.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.