Evidence mapPaperPMID 42528836Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Multimodal machine learning predicts type 2 respiratory failure in COPD exacerbations: a multicenter XGBoost model with clinical nomogram.

Yunyu Liu, Yang Zhou, Yalian Zhang, Juntao Tan, Jun Gong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yunyu LiuDepartment of Medical Insurance, Affiliated Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yang ZhouMedical Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangsu, China.
Yalian ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Juntao TanCollege of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jun GongDepartment of Information Technology, People's Hospital of Chongqing Hechuan, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) frequently lead to life-threatening type 2 respiratory failure (T2RF). Existing predictive models rely on single biomarkers or linear methods and lack rigorous external validation. This study aimed to develop a multimodal machine learning framework to predict in-hospital T2RF risk with temporal-geographic external validation. Methods: We employed a two-source design. A development cohort of 6,954 AECOPD patients from a single tertiary hospital (2023-2025) was randomly divided into training ( Results: In the internal test set, XGBoost achieved an AUROC of 0.660 (95% CI: 0.631-0.689). In the external validation set, XGBoost achieved an AUROC of 0.699 (95% CI: 0.661-0.738), with 45.9% sensitivity and 79.0% specificity. LightGBM performed comparably (AUROC 0.700). Seven predictors were selected: lymphocyte count, eosinophil count, COPD duration, RDW-CV, age, hypertension, and sex. SHAP analysis identified low lymphocyte count and long COPD duration as dominant risk drivers. The logistic nomogram achieved an external AUROC of 0.666. Conclusion: This externally validated framework enables early T2RF risk stratification at admission using routine blood counts and demographics. Future work should integrate dynamic monitoring and prospective multicenter validation.

Indexed as

AECOPDexternal validationmachine learningnomogramtype 2 respiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID42528836
PMCPMC13415698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.