ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Analysis of epicardial adipose tissue in relation to arterial hypertension using radiomics in photon-counting CT.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac CT is increasingly integrated into clinical routine. However, looking beyond the diagnostic aspect of identifying hemodynamically significant stenosis, individual risk stratification through interpretation of textural alterations of cardiac structures influenced by clinical risk factors, such as arterial hypertension, becomes increasingly relevant after the implementation of photon-counting CT. In this retrospective, single-center, IRB-approved study, 114 patients without coronary artery disease underwent PCCT. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) was manually segmented, and 1,015 radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics. Patients were divided into two groups defined by the presence or absence of arterial hypertension. Feature selection combined univariate analysis, recursive feature elimination, and random forest importance. Three machine-learning models were evaluated using a leakage-free protocol with repeated stratified cross-validation and a separately held-out test set. Logistic regression achieved the best but only moderate performance (cross-validated AUC 0.65; held-out test AUC 0.59). The most robust quantitative finding was a lower mean EAT attenuation in the hypertension group. These exploratory findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.