ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
The embedding of stress: mitophagy as a mechanism for the central nervous system (CNS) programming and lifelong disease vulnerability.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing epidemiological evidence shows that psychological stress is strongly associated with pathogenesis in modern society a correlational finding). Its effects on CNS are highly age- and cell-type specific. This review outlines how stress regulates mitophagy and dynamically disrupt CNS homeostasis across different life stages, including fetal development, adolescence, and aging, as well as across distinct cell types such as neurons, astrocytes, and microglia. These alterations ultimately increase susceptibility to neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders.): We propose an integrated "cell-age-stress" framework (Hypothesis 1) that highlights the bidirectional crosstalk between stress-induced mitochondrial damage and nuclear epigenetic reprogramming. We also present a "lifespan intervention hypothesis" (Hypothesis 2) and discuss precision fine-tuning strategies targeted to specific life stages and cell types, offering new directions for neuroprotective therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.