ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Wearable monitoring during music-based interventions in dementia: physiological and behavioral observations from a pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Music-based interventions (MBIs) are widely used in dementia care, but objective methods for characterizing participant responses during intervention sessions remain limited. Synchronized datasets combining wearable physiological signals and behavioral observations are particularly scarce. Methods: We conducted a pilot feasibility study involving five individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) who participated in 13 formal MBI sessions. Physiological signals, including photoplethysmography (PPG), electrodermal activity (EDA), skin temperature (TEMP), and accelerometry (ACC), were collected using a wrist-worn wearable sensor and synchronized with intervention playlists and time-stamped behavioral observations. Exploratory analyses examined physiological responses across intervention phases, participant-specific response patterns, time-of-day effects, and music-preference effects. Results: The dataset contains 13 intervention sessions, 99 music segments, and 248 behavioral observations. PPG, ACC, TEMP, and behavioral observations were available for all sessions, while EDA quality varied because of sensor-contact challenges. Behavioral responses were highly heterogeneous across participants, with engagement and calm behaviors observed most frequently. Physiological responses also showed substantial inter-individual variability, and case studies demonstrated that physiological and behavioral responses were not always concordant. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of collecting synchronized physiological, behavioral, and intervention-context data during MBIs in people living with dementia. The resulting publicly available multimodal dataset provides a foundation for future investigations of participant-specific responses and adaptive music-based interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.