ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Mapping therapy-responsive immune ecotypes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma through integrative omics.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a kidney cancer in which immune activity is closely intertwined with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) loss, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) signaling, angiogenesis, hypoxia, and metabolic adaptation. Although immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens have changed the treatment landscape of advanced ccRCC, only a subset of patients achieve durable benefit. Commonly used biomarkers, such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and broad inflammatory gene signatures, have not been sufficient to explain this variation or to guide routine treatment selection. One reason is that immune infiltration in ccRCC is not synonymous with effective antitumor immunity. A tumor rich in CD8+ T cells may still be resistant if these cells are exhausted, metabolically restricted, spatially separated from tumor nests, or surrounded by suppressive myeloid, stromal, and vascular programs. Therefore, the key issue is not simply whether a tumor is immunologically "hot" or "cold," but which part of the antitumor response has failed. In this Mini Review, we discuss ccRCC immunotherapy response from an immune-ecological perspective. We focus on several treatment-relevant immune states, including T-cell-inflamed but dysfunctional tumors, myeloid-dominant suppressive tumors, angiogenesis- and hypoxia-skewed tumors, and immune-excluded tumors. We also consider how bulk transcriptomics, single-cell and spatial profiling, T-cell receptor sequencing, proteomics, metabolomics, and longitudinal liquid biopsy may help define these ecotypes and capture treatment-induced remodeling. This perspective may support more refined patient stratification and more mechanism-matched immunotherapy strategies in ccRCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.