ReviewOncology reviews2026
Recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma: beyond resectability toward a biology-based therapeutic framework.
Review in Oncology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma remains a significant therapeutic challenge. Recurrence does not always indicate treatment failure but reflects different tumor biologies with diverse implications for local and systemic management. This review proposes a biology-based framework for recurrent RPS that incorporates histology, disease-free interval, tumor growth kinetics, multifocality, resectability, functional reserve, and therapeutic proportionality. Histological subtype significantly influences recurrence patterns. Well-differentiated liposarcoma often follows a chronic local-regional course, where multiple surgeries can offer long-term control. In contrast, leiomyosarcoma more commonly shows early systemic spread, which diminishes the benefit of repeated local treatments. Disease-free interval and tumor growth rate are important dynamic indicators that improve prognosis and assist in timing treatment. Complete resection is essential for a meaningful survival benefit, but resectability alone does not justify surgery. Radiotherapy and systemic therapy serve complementary roles, mainly in local control, biological modulation, and palliation. Prognostic tools and nomograms aid in initial risk assessment, but are most valuable when combined with dynamic factors that reflect tumor behavior. Future advancements will rely on clinically relevant biomarkers, adaptive predictive models, personalized surveillance, recurrence-focused clinical trials, and shared decision-making based on meaningful patient benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.