ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
High frequency chest wall oscillation for airway clearance in bronchiectasis.
Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory airway disease characterized by impaired mucociliary clearance, persistent mucus retention, recurrent infections, and progressive airway destruction. Airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are central to the management of bronchiectasis, aiming to interrupt the cycle of mucus stasis, infection, and inflammation. High frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) is a noninvasive mechanical ACT increasingly used to facilitate secretion mobilization and improve airway hygiene in patients with bronchiectasis. The objective of the current narrative review is to assess the current evidence regarding the use of HFCWO in patients with bronchiectasis, with emphasis on its physiological rationale, mechanisms of action, clinical applications, effectiveness, practical implementation, safety profile, and limitations. A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. Relevant studies were analyzed to summarize current evidence regarding the role of HFCWO in bronchiectasis management. The evidence suggests that HFCWO may improve mucus clearance, reduce symptom burden, enhance quality of life, and decrease exacerbation frequency in selected patients with bronchiectasis. HFCWO therapy is particularly useful in patients with chronic productive cough, impaired mucus clearance, frequent exacerbations, or inadequate response to conventional ACT therapies. Practical application requires individual adjustment of treatment frequency, session duration, oscillation frequency, and pressure amplitude according to disease severity and patient tolerance. Despite its benefits, HFCWO use may be limited by high device cost, maintenance requirements, and variable long-term adherence. Reported adverse effects are generally mild and include chest discomfort, dyspnea, transient oxygen desaturation, and fatigue. HFCWO represents a valuable second-line or adjunctive airway clearance therapeutic modality and may be considered in patients with bronchiectasis, particularly those with significant secretion burden and in whom traditional and active self-administered traditional techniques have failed, are poorly tolerated, or when cognitive/physical limitations prevent active patients' participation. Although current evidence supports its physiological and clinical benefits, future high-quality randomized studies are needed to better define patient selection criteria, long-term outcomes, adherence, and comparative effectiveness relative to other airway clearance techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.