ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Gastrointestinal toxicity associated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer patients: insights from a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors play an important role in the treatment of breast cancer and show therapeutic potential for gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. However, their real-world GI safety profile remains incompletely characterized. Methods: Disproportionate reporting signals of GI adverse events (AEs) were assessed using the ROR, PRR and BCPNN algorithms, based on data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database (2004-Q1 2025). Time-to-onset was analyzed using Weibull distribution, and serious vs. non-serious AE comparisons used non-parametric tests. Results: A total of 63,722 reports were associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer patients, among which 18,589 involved GI AEs. The three agents showed heterogeneous GI reporting patterns, with abdominal discomfort being the sole identified class-wide effect. Palbociclib accounted for the largest proportion of CDK4/6 inhibitor-related GI AE reports among the three agents, and its disproportionate reporting signals primarily involved oropharyngeal and upper GI events, with lip exfoliation and tongue blistering identified as its strongest signals. Ribociclib had the highest proportion of serious GI reports among the three drugs (82.38%), with 14.25% of its reports having a fatal outcome, and showed significant disproportionality signals for reflux gastritis and dysbiosis. For abemaciclib, gastrointestinal disorders was the most frequently reported System Organ Class, and diarrhea was its strongest disproportionate reporting signal. Notably, over 80% of positive GI pharmacovigilance signals detected in this study were absent from current prescribing information. All agents exhibited an early failure-type time-to-onset profile (β < 1), with a statistically significant difference in median onset time across agents: 15 days for abemaciclib, 27 days for ribociclib, and 49 days for palbociclib ( Conclusion: This study revealed heterogeneous disproportionate reporting patterns for GI AEs among CDK4/6 inhibitors and identified unlabeled pharmacovigilance signals. These findings are exclusively hypothesis-generating pharmacovigilance observations, not evidence of incidence, causal associations, or clinically confirmed inter-drug risk differences. The results might help prioritize drug-event pairs for further research and require validation in well-designed observational or prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.