ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Machine learning algorithms for predicting glycemic control and weight loss outcomes in GLP-1 receptor agonist users.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity; however, substantial inter-individual variability in glycemic and weight loss outcomes remains. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict glycemic control and weight loss outcomes following GLP-1 RA initiation using real-world data and to identify key features associated with treatment response. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the All of Us Research Program. Adult participants initiating GLP-1 RA therapy with available baseline and follow-up measurements were included. Two cohorts were constructed: a glycemic control cohort ( Results: For weight loss outcome prediction, ensemble models demonstrated superior performance, with RF and XGBoost achieving the highest discrimination (AUC ≈ 0.94) and accuracy (0.89-0.90). For glycemic control prediction, RF and XGBoost achieved modest performance (accuracy ≈ 0.73; AUC ≈ 0.79). SHAP analysis identified baseline BMI and body weight as the most influential features of weight improvement, while duration of diabetes, baseline HbA1c, and use of sulfonylureas or insulin were among the most important features of glycemic control. Discussion: Machine learning models, particularly tree-based ensemble methods, demonstrated strong potential for predicting treatment response to GLP-1 RA therapy. Integration of explainable ML approaches with real-world data may support personalized treatment strategies, and facilitate identification of patients most likely to benefit from GLP-1 RA therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.