ReviewBrain & spine2026
Sex differences in patient mortality after traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) causes high mortality and long-term disability, with profound physical, emotional, and socioeconomic impact. While males represent the majority of cases, females may have lower mortality, potentially due to neuroprotection and immune modulation. However, the impact of sex on mortality remains unclear, limiting opportunities for sex-specific management. Research question: To evaluate the association between sex and mortality after TSCI. Material and methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched on June 4, 2025. Observational studies reporting sex-stratified mortality in TSCI across all ages and injury severities were included. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by multiple reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis calculated odds ratios (OR) for mortality in females versus males, with leave-one-out sensitivity analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using I Results: Ten studies including 63,992 patients (18,788 females and 45,204 males) were analyzed, with no evidence of small study bias. Sex was not significantly associated with TSCI mortality (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69-1.07, p = 0.18). Sensitivity analyses and qualitative evaluation of individual studies (six of ten, adjusted analyses) indicated lower mortality in females. Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I Discussion and conclusion: Overall, sex was not associated with TSCI mortality. Nevertheless, individual studies and sensitivity analyses indicate lower mortality in females. These findings appear context-dependent, underscoring the need for future research to clarify when sex influences outcomes, supporting individualized risk stratification and sex-specific management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.