ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Higher-order statistics for constructing centered edge functional connectivity.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional connectivity is often constructed to understand functional organizations in neural systems, where the brain regions and their pairwise interactions are viewed as nodes and edges, respectively. In practice, functional connectivity is commonly estimated via the correlation of pairs of brain regions. One limitation is that the correlation coefficient captures only the pairwise linear dependence relationship between pairs of nodes and may fail to capture complex higher-order relationships. Recently, a novel concept known as edge-centric functional connectivity (eFC) has been introduced to measure interactions between pairs of edges based on the cofluctuation of two nodal time series, offering a new perspective for understanding brain networks. Nevertheless, eFC considers the absolute levels of edge time series, that is, their mean values, in estimation. If the parameter of interest is the covariation between a pair of edges, incorporating mean values of edge time series can introduce bias or deviation, resulting in a skewed estimation. In this manuscript, we propose an alternative approach to estimate the unbiased covariation between pairs of edges, termed centered edge functional connectivity (ceFC), with theoretical foundations. We demonstrate that the proposed estimator is consistent with a sufficient sample size or number of time frames. Additionally, we develop a multiple hypothesis testing framework with a controlled false discovery rate to evaluate the strength of the unbiased covariation among edges. Furthermore, we employ thresholding to obtain a thresholded estimator that has been shown to converge to the true ceFC matrix in high-dimensional settings in which the number of nodes is much larger than the number of samples or time frames. We validate the finite sample performance of the proposed methods via numerical studies and a data application using the Midnight Scan Club dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.