Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529670›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine reports2026

Factors influencing participation in lung cancer screening among screening-eligible adults: a scoping review.

Cynthia Schneider, Luca Bosso, Louis Gros, Marie-Anne Durand, Kevin Selby, L-Factors Study Group

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cynthia SchneiderUnisanté, University Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Ambulatory Care, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Luca BossoUnisanté, University Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Ambulatory Care, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Louis GrosLausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marie-Anne DurandUnisanté, University Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Ambulatory Care, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kevin SelbyUnisanté, University Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Ambulatory Care, Lausanne, Switzerland.
L-Factors Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Participation in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening remains suboptimal, and evidence on participation determinants is heterogeneous. This scoping review mapped participation factors using the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) framework to guide intervention development. Methods: We conducted an international scoping review of studies published between January 2013 and June 2025. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies examining participation among adults eligible for LDCT screening were included. Factors were coded inductively and mapped to framework domains. Overall, 3229 unique records were screened. Results: Thirty-nine studies were included: 22 quantitative, 13 qualitative, and four mixed-methods studies. Determinants spanned all framework domains. Factors most often associated with higher participation included risk awareness ( Conclusions: Participation reflects interacting factors. Health literacy barriers, misconceptions, and practical constraints may prevent favorable intentions from translating into uptake. Interventions should combine tailored communication, clinician engagement, improved access, and support addressing risk perception, fear, stigma, and trust.

Indexed as

BarriersCOM-BFacilitatorsLung cancer screeningParticipationScoping reviewUptake

Identifiers

PMID42529670
PMCPMC13417980

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.