Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42529806›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2026

Symbiont evolutionary history underpins quality to an insect host.

Audrey K Miller, Ava V Virtuoso, Kayla S Stoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Audrey K MillerDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32304, USA.
Ava V VirtuosoDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32304, USA.
Kayla S StoyDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32304, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5058-5145

Funding

KSS from Florida State University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While many insects have evolved mechanisms to ensure the faithful transmission of bacterial symbionts across generations, the majority of insects lack such mechanisms. Instead, many insects must acquire symbionts from their local environments. Without mechanisms for vertical transmission, insects are thought to be at risk of experiencing low fitness by acquiring low-quality symbiont strains. For example, insects dependent on environmental symbiont transmission may acquire nonsymbiotic bacteria or symbionts that are adapted to other co-localized hosts. Yet, insects often appear capable of interacting with a wide variety of symbiont strains, and environmental transmission is prevalent across diverse insect species. Therefore, it remains unclear whether the evolutionary history of a symbiont actually impacts its benefit to hosts. Here, we test whether the recent evolutionary history of a symbiont impacts its quality to an insect host by inoculating Anasa tristis De Geer (Hemiptera: Coreidae) insects with Burkholderiaceae strains isolated from a conspecific host, a distantly related heterospecific host, and from soil. We find that the soil strain offers few fitness benefits. In contrast, both strains with a recent history of host association support insect survival to adulthood, but the greatest benefits emerge from the symbiont isolated from a conspecific host, which also improves insect development rates. Overall, our study demonstrates that the evolutionary history of a symbiont may impact its quality to insect hosts and lays a foundation for future work to further examine whether environmental transmission carries costs for insect hosts.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHemipteraHeteropteraSymbiosisAnimalsCoreidaemutualismsymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID42529806
PMCPMC13420500

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.