ReviewJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B2026
Blood‒brain barrier permeability assessment: from biomimetic models to multimodal imaging.
Review in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligent biosensing and point-of-care testing: from molecular recognition to decentralized precision care.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The blood‒brain barrier (BBB) is a vital physiological structure that maintains the microenvironmental homeostasis in the central nervous system (CNS). Imbalances in its permeability play a key role in various neurological disorders, including stroke, neurodegenerative diseases, and brain tumors. The development of precise techniques for assessing BBB permeability is therefore paramount for elucidating the mechanisms of neurological diseases, overcoming drug development challenges, and achieving precise diagnosis and treatment of CNS disorders. This review systematically summarizes the latest advances in the assessment of BBB permeability. Regarding in vitro models, platforms have evolved from the traditional transwell system to microfluidic chips incorporating fluid shear forces and subsequently to highly biomimetic brain organoids, with continuous improvements in the ability to simulate the neurovascular unit (NVU) microenvironment. For in vivo assessment, we detail the principles and applications of imaging techniques, including dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), near-infrared II (NIR-II) fluorescence imaging (FI), and two-photon microscopy (TPM), highlighting their complementary strengths in macroscopic quantification, molecular targeting, and microscopic dynamic observation. The integration of multi-modal technologies and precise quantitative assessment is a prominent trend. Future investigations will focus on artificial intelligence (AI)-driven personalized permeability assessment, the development of novel intelligent probes, and the dynamic real-time monitoring of the BBB, thereby providing powerful methodological support for neurological disease research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.