ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
Relationship Value, Emotion, and Uncertainty Shape Conflict-Resolution Communication in a Wild Primate.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationship Value, Emotion, and Uncertainty Shape Conflict-Resolution Communication in a Wild Primate.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studying how nonhuman primates tailor signals and behavioral patterns to resolve ingroup conflicts provides insight into the evolution of communicative and behavioral complexity in conflict management. Here, we explore how, in wild geladas, primates with a uniquely rich vocal-visual repertoire, aggressors and victims take into account relationship value, perceived risk and uncertainty, emotional dynamics, and audience and external factors when producing nonaggressive signals after conflicts. We found that reconciliation in the study groups occurred rapidly, was mainly initiated by aggressors, and was mediated by post-conflict sequences composed of vocalizations, sometimes supplemented with visual signals and tactile patterns. The complexity of post-conflict sequences-indexed by their length, sensory channels, and signal types-was amplified in aggressor-victim dyads with stronger social bonds, following more intense victim distress signals, with dominant aggressors, and between genetically unrelated individuals. These patterns reflect sensitivity to uncertainty, relationship quality, emotional states, and to the external audience. Such behavioral flexibility helps individuals navigate the challenges of complex social life, where multiple relationships must be continuously tracked, thereby supporting social competence and group cohesion. Post-conflict signaling lies at the intersection of social and cognitive sophistication, revealing evolutionary links to human complex communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.