Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530369›Full record

ReviewChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology2026

Recent Advances in Fluorescent Probes for Imaging Enzyme Activity in NETosis.

Enebie Ramos Cáceres, Marijn J Hollander, Kimberly M Bonger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enebie Ramos CáceresChemical Biology & Immunology, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7964-0216
Marijn J HollanderDepartment of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2398-9171
Kimberly M BongerChemical Biology & Immunology, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9498-2620

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 802940Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek NWO-024.002.009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are web-like structures of DNA released by neutrophils during a specialized form of cell death called NETosis. Originally described as a mechanism of pathogen neutralization, NETs have since been implicated in a growing number of pathological conditions, including inflammatory diseases, autoimmunity, cancer, and neurodegeneration. The complexity and rapid dynamics of neutrophils and NET formation pose significant challenges for conventional approaches, highlighting a need for tools that can report molecular events with high spatial and temporal precision. Fluorescent probes have proven invaluable in this regard, offering both the sensitivity and selectivity required to study this process. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent progress on the development of fluorescent probes for imaging NETosis, focusing on their design principles, biological applications, and key limitations. We discuss how these tools have advanced our understanding of the stimulus-dependent and spatiotemporally distinct activation dynamics of enzymes central to NETosis. We further highlight remaining challenges and outline design strategies that we believe will guide the development of next-generation tools to investigate neutrophil biology in health and disease.

Indexed as

Extracellular TrapsFluorescent DyesNeutrophilsAnimalsFluorescent Chemosensor CompoundsHumansFluorescent Chemosensor CompoundsFluorescent Dyesbiosensorsenzymesfluorescent probesNETosisneutrophil

Identifiers

PMID42530369
PMCPMC13422139

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.