ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Use of artificial intelligence in clinical practice and hospitals].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly evolving from a research technology into a tool for everyday clinical practice. While early applications primarily focused on medical image analysis, generative AI systems and large language models are now available for a wide range of clinical and administrative tasks. These include medical documentation, literature review, guideline-based knowledge management, patient communication, and workflow optimization. At the same time, diagnostic and therapeutic applications continue to evolve. AI-assisted systems support radiological and pathological image interpretation, risk stratification, and clinical decision-making processes. Despite considerable opportunities, important limitations remain. AI hallucinations, algorithmic bias, data protection requirements, and regulatory considerations necessitate continuous human oversight and critical evaluation. Therefore, the long-term success of AI will depend not only on technological performance but also on its responsible integration into existing healthcare structures. This review provides a practice-oriented overview of current and future AI applications in urology and discusses opportunities, limitations, and prerequisites for safe implementation in clinical practice and hospital care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42530614What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.