Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530625›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2026

Antithrombogenic coated self-expanding stent (pEGASUS-HPC) for the treatment of intracranial dissections of the cerebral arteries in acute stroke: a multicenter study.

Abdallah Aburub, Hans Henkes, André Kemmling, Michael Forsting, Emilio Lozupone, Alfredo Pauciulo, Daniele Giuseppe Romano, Raffaele Tortora, Amedeo Cervo, Guglielmo Pero and 11 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Abdallah AburubDepartment of Neuroradiology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. abdullahaburub8@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2819-4623
Hans HenkesNeuroradiology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
André KemmlingDepartment of Neuroradiology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Michael ForstingInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Emilio LozuponeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Vito Fazzi, Lecce, Italy.
Alfredo PauciuloDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Vito Fazzi, Lecce, Italy.
Daniele Giuseppe RomanoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Ospedali Riuniti San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy.
Raffaele TortoraDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Ospedali Riuniti San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy.
Amedeo CervoDepartment of Neuroradiology, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, Napoli, Italy.
Guglielmo PeroDepartment of Neuroradiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Stefan SchobUniversity Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Radiology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Zakarya AliCentral Institute for Diagnostic anventional Radiology Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany.
Karim AllawDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Immunology and Microbiology,, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Philipp von GottbergNeuroradiology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Kamran HajiyevNeuroradiology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Mohammad AlmohammadDepartment of Neuroradiology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Pablo Albiña-PalermolaNeuroradiology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Ahmed AkgoelCentral Institute for Diagnostic anventional Radiology Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany.
Susanne KemmlingDepartment of Neuroradiology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Andrei FiliogloNeuroradiology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Ali KhanaferNeuroradiology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany. mr-khanafer@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracranial artery dissection (IADS) is an uncommon cause of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In hyperacute settings, stenting is constrained by the need for intensive antiplatelet therapy. This study evaluated the antithrombogenic hydrophilic polymer-coated pEGASUS-HPC self-expanding stent for IADS-related AIS.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study across seven stroke centers included consecutive patients with AIS and occlusion or severe flow-limiting stenosis caused by symptomatic IADS, who were treated with the pEGASUS-HPC. The outcomes were technical and angiographic success (device opening; mTICI score ≥2b when reperfusion was targeted), peri-procedural complications, mRS score, and follow-up patency.

resultsIn 36 treated patients (mean age 62.0 ± 19.6 years; 63.9% men), 91.7% of the dissections were spontaneous, and 80.6% were occlusive. Mechanical thrombectomy preceded stenting in 26/29 occlusive cases. Full stent opening occurred in 94.4%, and 100% reperfusion success was achieved in targeted vessels. Most patients received periprocedural intravenous antiplatelet bridging (75.0%) and were discharged on DAPT (77.8%). Whereas no intraprocedural complications occurred, four postprocedural events occurred during admission (11.1%), of which two were clinically significant and two were minor and asymptomatic. The mean NIHSS score improved from 11.8 at admission to 4.9 at discharge, and the mean discharge mRS score was 2.1. Clinical follow-up (mRS) was available in 33/36 patients (91.7%), with favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2) in 27/33 (81.8%). Imaging follow-up at the early window (mean 94 days) was available in 27/36 (75.0%). In-stent stenosis ≥ 50% occurred in 14.8% and 4.2% of patients at early and mid-term follow-up, respectively, whereas no device occlusions or recurrent strokes occurred through mid-term follow-up. Long-term imaging follow-up (15/36, 41.7%) showed no new in-stent stenosis.

conclusionspEGASUS-HPC stenting for IADS-related AIS was technically feasible and achieved high reperfusion rates and a low overall complication burden, thus supporting prospective evaluation with standardized antiplatelet protocols.

Indexed as

Acute ischemic strokeEmergency intracranial stentingHydrophilic polymer coatingIntracranial artery dissectionMechanical thrombectomypEGASUS-HPC stent

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.