ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Association between proton pump inhibitor co-medication and treatment switching in dasatinib-treated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a German real-world evidence study.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dasatinib absorption is pH-dependent, and concomitant use of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) can substantially reduce dasatinib exposure. Whether this interaction has clinical relevance and affects treatment outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study used German statutory health insurance claims data (2010 - 2024). Adults with CML who initiated dasatinib treatment were selected. Patients were classified according to concomitant PPI use around dasatinib initiation. The primary endpoint was time to switch to another systemic CML therapy. Two analytical cohorts were evaluated (incident and prevalent cohorts). Propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare patients with and without PPI co-medication. Sensitivity analyses censored follow-up at severe adverse events and restricted the population to users of the originator dasatinib formulation. Among 297 dasatinib patients in the incident and 372 in the prevalent cohort, PPI co-medication was observed in approximately 19-21% of patients. After matching, concomitant PPI use was consistently associated with earlier treatment switching. This association reached statistical significance in the prevalent cohort (hazard ratio: 1.87, 95% CI 1.18-2.95; p = .008) and was directionally consistent in the incident cohort. Sensitivity analyses yielded directionally consistent findings. In this large real-world analysis, concomitant PPI use was associated with earlier treatment switching in dasatinib-treated patients with CML. While causality cannot be established, these findings are consistent with the known pH-dependent interaction and reinforce existing recommendations to avoid PPI co-medication during dasatinib therapy whenever feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.