ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Parent-adolescent discordance in suicidal intent assessment after a suicide attempt: a convergent mixed-methods study.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicidal crisis in adolescence often emerges within a context of relational tension. Following a suicide attempt, the assessment of suicidal intent is critical yet complex, particularly when discrepancies arise between the adolescent's self-assessment and their parent's perception. These parent-adolescent discordances are understudied, despite their potential clinical significance. This prospective, monocentric, convergent mixed-methods study included 150 adolescent-parent dyads assessed after an SA. Suicidal intent was evaluated at baseline (T0) and 3 months later (T3) using parallel visual analogue scales completed independently by the adolescent and one parent. Discordance was defined as the difference between both scores. Linear regression models were used to explore associations with changes in suicidal distress. A subsample of 10 dyads underwent semi-structured interviews, analyzed through Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Adolescents rated their suicidal intent higher than their parents did (mean difference = + 2.53, p < 0.001). Three discordance profiles emerged: Parent-High Group, Concordant Group, and Parent-Low Group. Discordance was significantly associated with clinical outcomes at 3 months (p = 0.003). Adolescents in the Parent-Low Group showed the strongest improvements, while those in the Parent-High Group showed higher levels of persistent distress (p = 0.041). This association was attenuated after accounting for baseline adolescent-reported VAS severity. Qualitative analysis revealed the role of discordance as a marker of impaired communication, divergent interpretations, and challenges in parental adjustment. Parent-adolescent discordance in suicidal intent ratings provides clinical insight into the relational configuration of the post-attempt crisis. Its early assessment, alongside dedicated parental support, may improve crisis management. These findings support NICE recommendations for integrative and relational approaches to suicidal crises in adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42530685What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.