Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530688›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2026

A review of animal models of vascular dementia.

Yuanyu Song, Yinghua Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuanyu SongHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, 150006, China.
Yinghua ChenDepartment of Acupuncture Fifth, The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, No. 26, Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150006, Heilongjiang, China. chyh9000@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular dementia (VD) is characterized by the presence of cerebrovascular lesions, specifically hemorrhagic or ischemic lesions within the brain parenchyma, with ischemic lesions being more prevalent. The resultant progressive decline in cognitive abilities and memory poses a significant challenge to public health and quality of life. Consequently, a growing number of researchers have focused on exploring the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment strategies for VD. The establishment of suitable animal models for investigating the underlying mechanisms of VD treatment and assessing therapeutic efficacy has emerged as a focal point in this area of research. This review systematically compares the construction methods, pathological features, and behavioral phenotypes of classical and modified VD animal models, while analyzing their respective advantages and limitations. Key obstacles to clinical translation presented by the existing models are highlighted, including species differences, behavioral confounding factors, and issues related to methodological reproducibility. Furthermore, this article offers a reference framework for model selection based on various research objectives, aimed at enhancing the translational value of preclinical VD investigations.

Indexed as

Dementia, VascularDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsBrainHumansAnimal modelResearch reviewVascular dementia

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.