ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Oligoprogression in Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Integrating Local Therapy, Systemic Treatment Continuation, and Biomarker Reassessment.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo critically evaluate oligoprogression in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer and propose a practical multidisciplinary framework integrating local therapy, systemic treatment decisions, and biomarker reassessment.
methodsWe reviewed direct gastric/GEJ evidence and clearly distinguished it from evidence extrapolated from oligometastatic disease and other tumor types.
resultsNo prospective comparative study has demonstrated that local treatment with continuation of systemic therapy improves survival specifically in gastric/GEJ oligoprogression. In carefully selected patients, local treatment may be considered to delay the next systemic therapy, prevent or relieve symptoms, maintain local control, or preserve quality of life. Tissue rebiopsy or circulating tumor DNA analysis may be useful when technically obtainable and likely to change management. HER2 reassessment has established clinical relevance after HER2-directed treatment, whereas repeat assessment of CLDN18.2, PD-L1, FGFR2b, and other emerging targets remains exploratory. A negative plasma circulating tumor DNA result does not exclude resistant disease, particularly in low-volume, peritoneal, or central nervous system progression.
conclusionManagement should remain individualized and multidisciplinary, with explicit recognition that the proposed framework is provisional and that a survival benefit from local therapy with systemic treatment continuation remains unproven.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42530766What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.