Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2026
VEMORA: Vaginal Estrogen versus non-hormonal MOisturizer in women Receiving Aromatase inhibitors: a randomized, controlled trial.
Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGenitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) remains a significant unmet need for postmenopausal breast cancer survivors receiving aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy.
methodsIn this randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial, ER+ breast cancer survivors receiving adjuvant AI therapy with symptomatic GSM were randomized to receive 24 weeks of a non-hormonal vaginal moisturizer (Replens
resultsTwenty-three patients were enrolled (vaginal estrogen [VE], n = 11; non-hormonal [NH], n = 12). Vaginal dryness and dyspareunia scores improved significantly in the VE arm compared with the NH arm (p = 0.049, p = 0.048, respectively). Vaginal pH decreased significantly with vaginal estrogen compared to non-hormonal therapy (p = 0.0286). Other domains of sexual function (libido, ability to achieve orgasm, sexual satisfaction, and relationship with partner) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Serum estradiol levels remained low through the first 12 weeks of therapy. Two participants demonstrated estradiol elevations above threshold at 24 weeks (21.8 pg/mL and 16 pg/mL); both reported non-adherence to AI therapy preceding measurement.
conclusionIn this randomized study, vaginal estrogen provided greater improvement in vaginal dryness and dyspareunia than non-hormonal therapy in breast cancer survivors. These findings provide prospective evidence supporting symptomatic benefit with minimal systemic estrogen exposure in most patients, although larger studies with longer follow up are needed to define long-term safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42530772What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.