Evidence mapPaperPMID 42530804Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Women: Sex-Specific Insights Across the Continuum from Diagnosis to Outcomes.

Sharon Andrade-Bucknor, Shiva Barforoshi, D Elizabeth Le, Radmila Lyubarova, Jina Chung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sharon Andrade-BucknorDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, 1321 NW 14th Street, Suite 510, Miami, Fl, 33125, USA. s.andradebucknor@miami.edu.
Shiva BarforoshiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W Carson St. Box 405, Torrance, CA, 90502, USA.
D Elizabeth LeDivision of Hospital & Specialty Medicine, Section of Cardiology, VA Portland HealthCare System, Portland, OR, USA.
Radmila LyubarovaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Jina ChungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W Carson St. Box 405, Torrance, CA, 90502, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review highlights differences in pathophysiologic mechanisms, diagnostic challenges and therapeutic responses of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in women. RECENT

findingsEmerging research provides further insight into the pathophysiology of HFpEF in women, and the role of obesity and its impact on treatment. Other theories highlight the role of microvascular dysfunction in women with HFpEF. Gender differences in cardiac imaging parameters for assessment of diastolic dysfunction and elevated filling pressures may require refinement for improved diagnostic accuracy of HFpEF in women. HFpEF is fast becoming the dominant form of heart failure in the US and women have double the lifetime risk of developing HFpEF compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Gender-specific diagnostic parameters and treatment options have been hindered by low participation of women in cardiovascular trials. Increased participation in larger scale trials and further investigations into sex-specific pathophysiology are needed for improved outcomes in women.

Indexed as

Heart FailureStroke VolumeFemaleHumansObesitySex FactorsHeart failureHFpEFWomen

Identifiers

PMID42530804
PMCPMC13424267

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.