Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42530814›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

From Evidence to Application: An Operational Extension of Existing Sports Injury Frameworks for Sports Medicine Practitioners.

Adam M Mattiussi, Joseph W Shaw

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam M Mattiussi *Performance Rehabilitation, UK Sports Institute, Bisham, UK. mattiussi.adam@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7287-6501
Joseph W Shaw *Irish Rugby Football Union, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1538-9966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injuries are an inevitable consequence of most sports; however, organisations can use sports injury frameworks to guide the identification, understanding, and reduction of injury and time loss. The present article aims to introduce an operational extension of existing sports injury frameworks and synthesise key concepts to support decision-making when implementing strategies to reduce injury burden within applied environments. Throughout the framework, explicit actions and methods for achieving the desired outcomes are provided. The sports injury framework is made up of four stages: (1) Understand: Develop knowledge of injury burden and context; (2) Identify: Apply causal logic to identify potential solutions; (3) Prioritise: Determine format and select solution; and (4) Deliver: Execute and evaluate the solution. This sports injury framework synthesises existing best-practice guidelines of understanding epidemiology, alongside the sports context, when addressing injury; the value of considering time loss in terms of both incidence and severity to identify target injuries; a structure in which to form theorised causal pathways and identify potential solutions, and a flexible process to select the appropriate format of potential interventions and prioritise them accordingly.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.