ArticlePain and therapy2026
Intravenous Opioid Dose Titration for Refractory Cancer Pain: A Comparative Analysis of Switching from Transdermal Fentanyl to Morphine or Methadone.
Article in Pain and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSwitching from transdermal fentanyl (TDF) to other opioids is clinically challenging because of the subcutaneous reservoir that delays drug elimination. This study compares the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) dose titration with morphine (MO) versus methadone (ME) as a "bridging" strategy to overcome this pharmacological lag.
methodsIn this secondary analysis of an observational cohort study, patients who required an opioid switching from TDF (≥ 50 µg/h) to IV morphine or IV methadone were selected. As per protocol of the original study, patients were titrated with IV boluses of MO (n = 17) or ME (n = 22) until analgesia was achieved, followed by continuous infusion and subsequent oral conversion. The primary outcome was clinical stabilization; secondary outcomes included the comparison of final oral morphine equivalents (OME).
resultsBoth groups achieved analgesia rapidly. The median IV dose required for stabilization was 10 mg for MO and 15 mg for ME (p = 0.152). Methadone demonstrated a significant "opioid-sparing" effect, allowing stabilization with equianalgesic doses (OME) significantly lower than those used in the morphine group and compared to baseline TDF.
conclusionIV opioid dose titration is a safe and effective method for managing TDF switching effectively eliminating the "waiting period" associated with patch removal. While both drugs are effective, methadone stands out for its ability to significantly lower the total daily opioid requirement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.