ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026
Beyond a Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient and Caregiver Expectations About Emergency Department Visits Amid Uncertainty.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to "Methodological Considerations on Coding Analysis and Sampling in a Study of ED Patient Expectations".Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Methodological Considerations on Coding Analysis and Sampling in a Study of ED Patient Expectations.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond a Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient and Caregiver Expectations About Emergency Department Visits Amid Uncertainty.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPatients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) have been described as expecting a diagnosis or explanation for symptoms, yet diagnostic uncertainty is especially prevalent for those with nonspecific symptoms like headache, dizziness, abdominal pain, and chest pain. Given limited research examining patient and caregiver expectations about diagnosis when uncertainty exists, we aimed to investigate these expectations to inform safe, high quality, patient-centered diagnostic communication in emergency settings.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study in two Australian metropolitan EDs using semi-structured interviews with patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms (n = 24) and their caregivers (n = 11) about their expectations regarding the visit and diagnosis. We analyzed interview transcripts in NVivo using content and thematic analysis.
resultsParticipant expectations about their ED visit and diagnosis were shaped by previous healthcare experiences, understanding of symptom characteristics, familiarity with medical knowledge and uncertainty tolerance. Three themes captured expectations by content: outcomes (understanding, treatment and guidance), processes (diagnostic investigations and being taken seriously), and the health service (timely, integrated care). While most participants reported wanting a diagnosis or explanation, many demonstrated awareness of diagnostic uncertainty and its implications, revealing diverse expectations across a certainty spectrum. Many expected diagnostic investigations, regarding them as integral to determining outcomes but recognized they may not resolve uncertainty. Some regarded EDs as a 'one-stop shop' providing timely diagnostic outcomes. Patients who had previously experienced symptom invalidation expressed strong expectations about being taken seriously.
conclusionsPatient and caregiver expectations about their ED visit and diagnosis are more nuanced than previously recognized. Findings highlight the importance of clinicians soliciting and responding to hopes and expectations in ways that address the uncertainty inherent in diagnosis. Understanding patient and caregiver hopes and expectations better equips clinicians to communicate in a patient-centered way about diagnosis and the diagnostic process in EDs, to enhance care even when uncertainty persists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.