ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Beyond technology usefulness: Health system reliability, and socio-demographic and professional factors as shapers of technostress in physicians.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare digitalisation may improve care yet can undermine clinicians' wellbeing through technostress. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of physicians in Catalonia, Spain (March-April 2024; n = 423) using the Technostress Creators Scale to quantify overall technostress and five techno-stressors (overload, invasion, complexity, insecurity and uncertainty). Hierarchical regression with bootstrapped standard errors assessed incremental contributions of demographics, digital experience and use, and contextual factors. Overall technostress was moderate (2.91 ± 0.59/5); techno-overload (3.37 ± 0.82) and techno-uncertainty (3.29 ± 0.74) were highest, while techno-insecurity was lowest (2.15 ± 0.74). Across models, greater professional experience and the interaction between gender (women), hospital care, and location in non-metropolitan areas were significant predictors. A higher probability was also detected in tasks where technology is more prevalent in healthcare, patients also have access to it and are pressured to use it, and where technical problems are frequent. Finally, moderators related to the digital maturity of professionals and better access to, and usability of digital tools were identified. These findings should be interpreted as exploratory associations, given the non-probabilistic convenience sample and the cross-sectional design, which preclude claims about population representativeness, response rate estimation, or causal inference. Nevertheless, the results suggest that promoting physicians' digital wellbeing requires attention to sociodemographic, professional, and technological factors associated with higher technostress.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.