Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42531351›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Combining sampling and attractor dynamics in spiking models of head direction systems.

Vojko Pjanovic, Jacob A Zavatone-Veth, Paul Masset, Sander W Keemink, Michele Nardin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vojko PjanovicJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Jacob A Zavatone-VethSociety of Fellows and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Paul MassetDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-7515
Sander W KeeminkDepartment of Machine Learning and Neural Computing, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5043-6724
Michele NardinJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8849-6570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural populations can maintain stable representations of navigation-related variables while integrating uncertain sensory signals. Experimental evidence showed that the precision of head-direction (HD) representations in flies and mice depends on the reliability of sensory cues, highlighting the influence of input uncertainty in attractor-based neural circuits. How do neural dynamics maintain stability while computing under uncertainty? Here, we propose a spiking neural network that unifies two principles - stability through attraction and uncertainty through fluctuation - and reinterpret the HD circuit as an uncertainty-aware integrator rather than a deterministic compass. Specifically, the network uses sampling-based probabilistic inference, where a neural population represents input uncertainty by rapidly fluctuating among likely hypotheses about the world while preserving a stable representation of head direction along an attractor manifold. This formulation suggests why a classical HD "bump" becomes less precise, namely due to rapid fluctuations, reflecting the uncertainty in angular velocity inputs. Our implementation yields experimentally testable predictions: correlated subthreshold voltage fluctuations, multi-timescale nonlinear interaction patterns, and characteristic statistics of bump movement. By combining probabilistic inference with attractor dynamics within one single circuit, our framework suggests how neural populations across species can represent an estimate and its uncertainty through fluctuations while maintaining stability, which could be a general principle for uncertainty-aware computation in noisy biological systems.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsHead MovementsModels, NeurologicalAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationMiceNerve NetNeuronsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42531351
PMCPMC13450861

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.