ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Combining sampling and attractor dynamics in spiking models of head direction systems.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conscious active inference I: A quantum model naturally implements the path integral needed for real-time planning and control.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural populations can maintain stable representations of navigation-related variables while integrating uncertain sensory signals. Experimental evidence showed that the precision of head-direction (HD) representations in flies and mice depends on the reliability of sensory cues, highlighting the influence of input uncertainty in attractor-based neural circuits. How do neural dynamics maintain stability while computing under uncertainty? Here, we propose a spiking neural network that unifies two principles - stability through attraction and uncertainty through fluctuation - and reinterpret the HD circuit as an uncertainty-aware integrator rather than a deterministic compass. Specifically, the network uses sampling-based probabilistic inference, where a neural population represents input uncertainty by rapidly fluctuating among likely hypotheses about the world while preserving a stable representation of head direction along an attractor manifold. This formulation suggests why a classical HD "bump" becomes less precise, namely due to rapid fluctuations, reflecting the uncertainty in angular velocity inputs. Our implementation yields experimentally testable predictions: correlated subthreshold voltage fluctuations, multi-timescale nonlinear interaction patterns, and characteristic statistics of bump movement. By combining probabilistic inference with attractor dynamics within one single circuit, our framework suggests how neural populations across species can represent an estimate and its uncertainty through fluctuations while maintaining stability, which could be a general principle for uncertainty-aware computation in noisy biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.