ArticleBMJ open2026
Establishing international expert consensus on core competencies and best practices in osteopathic education: a modified Delphi study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteopathic education is typically delivered through accredited higher education institutions with curricula not only varying widely but also inconsistently aligned with contemporary evidence. This lack of standardisation creates challenges in accreditation, workforce mobility and public understanding of the osteopathic role.
objectiveThe objective of this study aims to develop international expert consensus on core osteopathic capabilities through a structured Delphi process. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol describes a three-round modified Delphi study involving international experts in osteopathic education. Participants will be purposively recruited from accredited osteopathic education programmes and professional networks and must have at least 5 years' experience in osteopathic education, curriculum development or clinical supervision. A target sample of 40-60 experts will be sought. In round 1, participants will respond to open-ended questions exploring core competencies and educational priorities. Responses will be independently coded by two members of the research team using thematic analysis before being synthesised into consensus statements through investigator agreement. Rounds 2 and 3 will involve structured rating of these statements using a 4-point Likert scale with optional free-text comments to refine wording where appropriate. Descriptive statistics will be used to determine consensus, assess stability between rounds and guide item retention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the RMIT University Human Research Ethics Committee, Australia (2025-29731-30793). Participation is voluntary and pseudo-anonymous, with informed consent obtained electronically. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and to professional bodies to support curriculum alignment, accreditation processes and international dialogue on capability development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.