ArticleScientific reports2026
Manual federated simulation for multiple sclerosis integrating XGBoost algorithm with SHAP explanation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system, underscoring the importance of early and accurate diagnosis. In this study investigates the predictive modelling of MS progression in patients with Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS), privacy-preserving for a federated and explainable Machine Learning (ML) framework. To address missing data while preserving inter-feature dependencies, Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) with iterative imputers was employed. Classification was performed using the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Model interpretability was developed through Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques, specifically Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). To ensure data confidentiality and simulate decentralized clinical environments, an in silico federated learning framework was applied. Experimental results demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving 96.7% accuracy and 99% ROC-AUC during training, 92.5% accuracy in validation, and 81.8% accuracy with an AUC of 88% on the test set. For the Federated Learning (FL) simulation, the model maintained competitive performance, yielding an accuracy of 76.3% and an AUC of 83.9%. The proposed approach supports early diagnosis, enhances clinical trust through interpretability, and promotes secure data collaboration, thereby contributing to more informed and transparent clinical decision-making and improved patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.