ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-domain identification of myocardial infarction incidence using explainable AI: the overlooked role of periodontal health.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial infarction (MI) is a major global health concern influenced by diverse risk factors. Despite growing evidence of oral-systemic connections, current MI models largely exclude oral health indicators, reflecting the longstanding separation between dental and medical paradigms. This study introduces a multidomain, interpretable machine learning framework that integrates detailed periodontal and oral hygiene variables, marking one of the first efforts to quantitatively incorporate these features into MI incidence identification. A population-based case-control dataset comprising 1,355 individuals and heterogeneous variables was used to train and evaluate seven supervised classifiers via nested cross-validation. Among them, XGBoost achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.88 ± 0.01; F1 score = 0.74 ± 0.03) and was further probability-calibrated using isotonic regression, yielding a mean Brier score of 0.14 ± 0.01 and demonstrating well-aligned predicted probabilities. SHAP values confirmed the importance of conventional cardiovascular predictors, while several periodontal indicators such as mean clinical attachment loss, plaque index, and gingival bleeding emerged among the most influential features. Sex-stratified SHAP analysis revealed sex-specific patterns in the relative impact of oral features. Additionally, individual-level waterfall plots illustrated how oral inflammation may contribute independently or in combination with conventional factors to MI incidence identification. These findings support a systems-level view of periodontitis as a modifiable, biologically relevant factor in cardiovascular health and underscore the value of considering oral-health markers within screening and management frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.